A Critique of Today’s Guardian


I want to look at a headline in today’s Guardian with a critical eye. It’s called, “Putin’s disturbing message for the west: your rules don’t apply: Litinenko findings further highlight Russian president’s paranoid nationalism and international indifference.”

The headline caught my attention this morning because it is so didactic. The Guardian isn’t even pretending at subtlety anymore—its headlines now conveniently contain the reader’s expected reaction. There are two ways to read “disturbing:” One: that the Guardian assumes its readers will be disturbed. In that case, subtlety is best. A good comedian does not say, “This joke will really make you laugh: here I go!” It’s cringe-worthy in both cases. The second way is that the journalist himself thought it was disturbing. That is a good way to write opinion columns and a bad way to write news. If the journalist was confident enough that Putin’s attitude was disturbing, he could have easily said, “Putin’s Message to the West: Your Rules Don’t Apply,” and the journalist could go on to defend that gathering (that Putin’s message is indeed “your rules don’t apply,”) in a reasonable and logical way (the journalist does not do that very well). May I please have the information about Putin’s “message for the west” before I decide if I am disturbed? Maybe I will be disturbed, but to inform me of my own future reaction has put me off right from the very start.

Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 6.07.23 PM.pngPrepare to be “disturbed,” Guardian readers. Putin has said something that will disturb you. Read on! The Guardian has slipped into the clickbait habits of some of its internet-born fellows like BuzzFeed, introducing the story with a cliff-hanger. In my experience, a hefty headline like this must lead to a let-down of a story. In an age of over-hype, I am exhausted. The same way we have all learned to identify a clickbait headline or an ad, we are beginning to know how to identify a tabloid: over-hype. What I want is straight-forwardness. Of course there will always be bias in news, but I predict (and hope for) a quick shift as readers learn to trust news and distrust tabloids. Tell me the news and tell it plain. Stop with the clickbait.

Is it too much to hope for that a newspaper could print a news story that is really just facts about events? Maybe a bit of a catch up on the history of the situation? Could the journalist at least pretend to make an effort to hide biases? It comes down to a lack of trust of the reader—The Guardian thinks it knows what its readers should think about this, so they leave fact holes in the story and a big shiny red button of a headline. I hope readers notice when they’re being talked down to and I hope they stay skeptical.

A Critique of Today’s Guardian

2 thoughts on “A Critique of Today’s Guardian

  1. John McWillliams says:

    Hi Dannika:
    Just today I happened to come across your post called “An Open Letter to the Church from My Generation.” I was wondering if feel you might have the intellectual honesty and integrity to read something I wrote on this subject and give me your feedback. I have shared it with numerous Christians across the country who are leaders in the movement to support pro same-sex marriage. I have promised each of them that if they can answer the theological questions I pose in the paper and show me where my facts are wrong, I’ll apologize for writing the paper and take it down from the Internet immediately. As you’ll see it’s still up there. I make the same offer to you.
    As you’ll see in the paper, I’m not some kind of religious nut case who hates gay people. In fact, my respect and love for gay Christians is why I wrote the paper in the first place. I do raise some tough questions that have yet to be answered and I document lots of actual facts that many Christians are keeping very quiet.
    If you are up for a challenge, Just Google the title. “Homosexuality: Blessing or Sin? The Facts Many Pro Same-Sex Christians Are Keeping Very Quiet.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s